Leading Change

The terribleer you push, the harder the system pushes cover song is the 2nd law in The Laws of the Fifth Discipline. These laws ar the core of a mathematical process called systems thinking and the concept is that its best to manage the system, non well(p) the individual processes. (West & Cianfrani, 2004, p. 69) Corporations encounter a tendency to look at the reign over linear cause and government issue relationships, rather than looking at interactions. (West & Cianfrani, 2004, p. 69) Peter Senges book The Fifth Discipline identified 10 laws that defined systems thinking.The 2nd law in The Laws of the Fifth Discipline stinker be interpreted as Compensating feedback. Senge defines this as when well-intentioned interventions call forth responses from the system that offset the benefits of the intervention. (Senge, 1990, p. 58) In other words, the more(prenominal) attack exerted to commute or improve the current organizational processes, the more effort it requires.Orga nizations bewilder experienced this process when, for example, a product or brand suddenly gets to lose its popularity within the market. When organizations begin to push invigorated marketing strategies aggressively it often turns out that more revenue is spent on the marketing efforts with notwithstanding a temporary pay back. This process is not only limited to the business market, it can in addition be illustrated in in the flesh(predicate) experiences. Senge uses the smoker as an example if a person who is a standard smoker suddenly quits he or she might begin to gain weight, begin discomfited with personal appearance and therefore suddenly begin smoking again. (Senge, 1990, p. 59)As humans it is natural for us to get drawn into the process of compensating feedback. We push harder and its exhausting and we often glorify the suffering that ensues. (Senge, 1990, p. 59) When our efforts to elevate c aren fail initially, we push harder and often clear the belief tha t our hard proceed and effort leave over come in all of the obstacles in front of us.However, compensating feedback is a process where we amaze blind to the fact that our efforts ar actually contributing to the current obstacles we argon facing as well as creating others we mustiness(prenominal) overcome. (Senge, 1990, p. 59-60)oer the past both decades information and communication technology has ceaselessly evolved and has empowered small businesses and large corporations with novel emerging markets and tools. The net income has give out the information highway and has impacted both(prenominal) social and economic relationships in various sectors such as education, health, government, trade and tourism. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. vii)In order to maintain its impact on confederacy the information technology must continuously evolve to compensate for proximo needs for both topical anesthetic and global societies. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. VI) Focusing on one idea or concept that does not elicit long-term victor consumes season and effort that is peremptory to online success.The consistent evolution of technology and the platforms go outd are numerous and are impacting our society regularly. These bare-assedly emerging technologies affect the way we do business, communicate with others, daily entertainment, study and do research. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. VI) Ecommerce is the largest growing platform of the World Wide Web and it has provided a red-hot momentum of doing business in the digital economy. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. VI)In order to compensate and specify to the constant miscellany through the earnings surroundings we must be able to identify the implications. At the end of 2004 it was estimated that 750 million users represented the Internet partnership worldwide. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. VI)The e- grocerys consist of various products and services that market their products both from Business to Business and Business t o consumer. These products and services provide value for both buyers and sellers.In order to create a successful ecommerce venture processes must be transformed from the traditional ways of doing business to modern Internet transactions that are efficient to both the buyer and the seller. The biggest challenge for internet businesses is adapting to the virtual environs and integrating their current business processes into the e-marketplace. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. 97)The Internet purlieu has its benefits as well as disadvantages, or threats. On a local business level it like a shot provides easy and fast entrance to unexampled markets, 24/7 business hours, less physical word forming maintenance, and the possibility of sales increasing. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. 99) For buyers this offers more selection of products and services, 24/7 business devil and easy similarity between the various sellers offers. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. 99)Threats for businesses as a whole are the loss of direct customer face to face relationships, increased competition and the extra funds needed for consistent upgrading of products and platforms. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. 99) For buyers in that location is the same lack of direct face to face relationships, the unknown reliability of the seller and lack of affirm in products and services. (Waddell & Singh, 2003, p. 99)E-commerce is about rediscovering the individuality of the customers and their needs, and the creation of frictionless modes of commercial interaction with them. (May, 2000, p. 4) Businesses must set about salmagundi in an internet environment carefully, as in the traditional business model the direct interaction allows the consumer to tint outstanding. Ecommerce does not provide the close interaction thence it is imperative that the online business practices allow the consumer to feel like a person, not a type. (May, 2000, p. 5)A great example of ecommerce success is virago.com. This company has proven its ability to implement throw and business growth without affecting its customer base or travel behind the competition. The vision of the Earths biggest bookstore (May, 2000, p. 52) was to offer a range and large metre of products that would dominate traditional booksellers and to achieve market ubiquity without acquiring retail real estate. (May, 2000, p. 52)Jeff Bezos identified books as an ideal product for selling online because the number of books the traditional bookseller could offer was limited therefore, if these products were offered online the number available would be unlimited. In a sense the book trade has forever been virtual any customer can enter a traditional bookstore and order any book in print.Amazon.com brought a new online concept to the book trade and improved the efficiency of a traditional process. However, though this insight was remarkable introducing the concept into the ecommerce marketplace meant that consistent change was necessary and that customers must receive the same vigilance and personal relationships currently experienced in the traditional environment. (May, 2000, p. 53-54)In order to change the ecommerce impersonal environment Amazon.com had to lay out a new strategy into maintaining and increasing its customer base. Changing the internet environment is not a simple display creation or the addition of a personable salesperson to physically approach customers. Amazon.com had to approach this change with a technology based solution that offered a personal approach to its customers. The applications Amazon implemented offered their customers a positive experience.Customers are now able to access their portfolios at any time and without interaction with a sales representative. These portfolios are personalized and address customers on a first institute basis, provide purchase history and even suggest similar titles that might be of interest to the customers. This change provided a personal touch, saved Ama zon on staff time and clearly benefits the customer. (May, 2000, p. 54)Rick berry, chief executive officer of ICGCommerce.com, an Internet-Based procurance business, describes wind an e-commerce business as driving a Ferrari with a cinderblock on the accelerator. (Pandya, 2004) This fast-paced environment requires consistent change, as E-Procurement is a $10 trillion market worldwide. (Pandya, 2004)Berry states that building a procurement business in the traditional sense would take at least 10 years to become successful however within the internet environment they are do an attempt to establish credibleness within six months. Their goal is to grab a chunk of that market before the competition moves in. (Pandya, 2004)Berry believes that talent is what businesses require to provide effectual leading and the ability to change quickly within Internet based businesses. leadinghip must establish the ability to attract teams of talented risk-takers. (Pandya, 2004) The speed of t he working environment in an e-commerce structure means that very little time is available to train staff therefore draws of e-commerce ventures must strive to create a specific type of work culture that is high-voltage and results-oriented. (Pandya, 2004)Because little time is allowed for training and communication in an internet environment is more direct than others, changing the actions of others as well as effectively communicating the vision of change is difficult. You communicate directly, and you must build a team that can cope with that. (Pandya, 2004)If an internet company is to be successful it must begin with establishing a visionary culture with the ability to attract and retain talented staff. Talented staff members have the ability to effectively introduce change within the internet environment effectively and without disrupting business flow.David Perry, forefather of Chemdex says that creating a successful business with the ability to adapt to the constant chang e of the internet environment is raise money, so you can hire good people, so you can make and sell good products, so you can raise more money. (Pandya, 2004) These staff members must be enthusiastic, passionate and share the organizations values. (Pandya, 2004)In his article titled The True Value of interchange commission, George Spafford quotes The only constant is change. (Spafford, 2005) He believes that umpteen IT organizations lack a fundamental understanding of the need to manage change and that these organizations feel that change precaution stops at budgetary cookery.When introducing change into the internet environment organizations must understand that this process has large impacts on business operations the more complex the change is within the system the effective change concentre processes increase. (Spafford, 2005) As most change within the internet environment is technology based, its imperative to know that 80% of security breaches have been caused by hum an error. (Spafford, 2005)Potential solutions in technology have three parts people, technology and process. (Spafford, 2005) Most organizations have processes in place where change requests are submitted, reviewed, plan tested, scheduled and then implemented. (Spafford, 2005) The procedures are put into place to ensure that proper thought and planning have been applied and the implications assessed before introducing it within the business structure.Spafford believes that legion(predicate) organizations lack the elections to implement change and that many but give up once the implications have surfaced with unsuccessful results. He believes that companies must learn from their mistakes and work continuously to improve and implement future successes. Developing one simple model of change in an internet environment can also be devastating. The point is to be flexible, keep costs down and extend responsive, adopting multiple change models. (Spafford, 2005)The ability to manage ch ange within the internet environment provide always be a challenge for organizations. Effective leadership is the key to any organizations success as well as leaderships ability to attract talented staff members who are constantly looking to the future, rather than traditional one-sided ideas.Technology is constantly evolving and introducing new competitive strategies into the ecommerce marketplace and little time is available to adapt to the competition. Looking back at The Laws of the Fifth Discipline, The harder you push, the harder the system pushes back we see that its imperative to remain open-minded and constantly looking to the future where new concepts and ideas will introduce positive changes to the Internet environment.ReferencesMay, P. (2000). The Business of Ecommerce From Corporate Strategy to Technology. juvenile York, New York Cambridge University.Pandya, M. (2004). Center for attractership and Change Management Leadership in E-Commerce What does it Take to Lead a n E-Commerce Venture? Retrieved from http//leadership.wharton.upenn.edu/ecommerce/articles/Wharton_ECommerce_Forum.shtmlSenge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York, New York Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.Spafford, G. (2005, August 15). Datamation The True Value of Change Management. Retrieved from http//itmanagement.earthweb.com/service/article.php/3527471Waddell, D., & Singh, M. (2003). E-Business Innovation and Change Management. capital of the United Kingdom Idea Group Inc (IGI).West, J., & Cianfrani, C. A. (2004). Unlocking the Power of Your Qms Keys to Business Performance Improvement. Milwaukee, Wisconsin American Society for.Leading Change knowledgeableness Intense global competition, rapid expert change, and international capital markets are creating more demand for change leadership than at perhaps any other time in history. These forces, combined with the complexity of new and more global organizational forms that span nations and unite organizations through all iances, joint ventures, and mergers and acquisitions, make the job of leadership increasingly difficult. No wonder it is popular to suggest that leadership is in short supply in most organizations. Moreover, we have a limited understanding of the role that leaders should play in making effective change a reality. This is the motivation for this essay. In the pages that follow, I discuss how leaders can financial aid organizations change to meet the challenges of the twenty-first century.Body of the Essay It is one thing to argue that organizations need to reinvent themselves and pay off about new, more effective approaches to organizing, and quite another to accomplish it. Large-scale organizational sack is, at best, a develop art that has yet to produce any clear formulas for success, but more and more attention is being turned to executives as the principle agents of change and adaptation. It is increasingly common to assume that leadership plays the polar role in an organiz ations successful adaptation to a changing world. Companies are paying record requital to attract the best and brightest executive talent to lead them safely through todays turbulent business environment. many another(prenominal) boards and executive recruiters assume that there exists an elite corps of individuals who possess leadership skills that have almost universal joint application.The subject of leadership and organization change is embedded deeply in the lexicon and discourse of business executives, management consultants, and organizational scholars. Business periodicals, the trade press, and academic publications are brimming with information and knowledge about leading organization change. Widespread attention to leading change is largely a reflection of the times. Fueled by unprecedented changes in technologies, markets, and economies, organizations are experiencing rapidly changing environments and enormous competitive pressures. Responses to these challenges are re sulting in a virtual revolution in new organizational forms and systems. Organizations are increasingly seeking to transform themselves to become more adaptable and competitive, with leaner, more flexible structures, more empowered and committed employees, and more performance-driven human resource practices. (Lawler et al., 1995)As organizations strive to implement these innovations, they discover that change is incredibly arduous, requiring a great deal of expertise, resources, and luck. The sheer hassle of transforming organizations is evident in their enormous inertial qualities as well as the scope and magnitude of the required changes. Organization regeneration typically involves radical changes in strategy and structure, in work practices and methods, and in members perceptions, norms, and work behaviors. As many observers have pointed out, because transformational change involves the total organization including strategic relationships with the competitive environment, top leaders or CEOs need to lead the change process and are essential to its success. (Tichy & Devanna, 1986 Greiner & Bhambri, 1989 Nadler, 1997)The Harder You Push, The Harder The System Pushes Back every organization has its own corporate culture and the employees in all hierarchies are accustomed to that particular culture. convey about any change at any level is bound to shake the status quo and bring in an element of disturbance within the smooth functioning of the organization. Keeping that in mind, the change leader has to be extremely careful in doing the job and allowing ample space and time for the employees and other variables to adjust to the change being brought about. If the change process is accelerated too much and transformation is imposed hard on the people and the system as a whole, it will result in increased safeguard from the system and mounting difficulties in the process of change.Change involves moving from the known to the unknown (Cummins/Worley, 1993). Be cause the future is indistinct and may adversely affect peoples competencies, worth, and coping abilities, organizational members generally do not support change, unless compelling reasons convince them to do so. Similarly, organizations tend to be heavily invested in the status quo, and they rule out changing it in the face of uncertain future benefits. Consequently, a key issue in planning for action is how to motivate commitment to organizational change, such as Business Reengineering. This requires management attention to two related tasks creating readiness for change and overcoming resistance to change. http//www.prosci.com/w_4.htmPeople can be made ready to accept and add together towards change once they themselves get to feel the need for change. This means making people so discontent with the status quo that they are provoked to try new ways of performing. Generating such discontent can be to a certain extent difficult. People who have been functioning and behaving in w ays that have become norms for them now, may find it difficult to the level of hurt, prior to their undertaking the change seriously. In a stain as sensitive as such, the change has to be led very cautiously providing room for delay. The many issues related to change leadership could be structured nigh multiple themes. They include leader behaviors for effective change, sources of change, different change strategies, whether leadership really matters, and the development of change leaders.Most leadership scholars emphasize the importance of developing a vision or way as the first measurement in leading change. This direction is critical in making sure that everyone is moving in the same direction. It is, however, an open question whether a vision is really necessary for leading change. A key issue, particularly in the literature on charismatic leadership, is how to create a sense of empowerment and ownership for employees.One argument is that this requires giving employees the a utonomy to pick up appropriate means for implementing the vision. (Conger, 1989) Prior research has shown that employees are most motivated when they have the freedom to check up on what works best given their talents and skills. (Spreitzer et al., 1997) However, in order for such autonomy to work employees must have access to the resources necessary for implementation and to information about the competition and the financial situation of their organization without these they are likely to feel helpless in bringing about change. Also, rewards may be particularly cooperative in building a sense of ownership. (Lawler, 1986)Leaders in crisis organizations facing a revitalization challenge must devote considerable effort at the front end of their transformation to the creation of resources. Individuals resistance to change builds in direct proportion to the magnitude of the gap they perceive between the level of effort evaluate of them as part of the transformation process and the resources available to get the job done. Often this initial resource-generating step involves closing and consolidating peripheral or under-performing operations, trimming employee payrolls, reducing corporate staff overhead expenses, and suspending or deferring programs so that current operations can generate more cash to be redeployed to the launch of the corporate transformation process. Leaders attempting to revitalize their organizations also need to seek new external resources as they launch their transformation process.For example, at General Electric during the early 1980s under Jack Welch, the creation of slack resources was not so much a problem as was the reallocation of existing resources to the corporate transformation effort. So the initial transformation issue was less one of resource creation than one of resource reallocation. Businesses that did not fit the vision had to fix, sell, or close themselves, and resources that would otherwise be consumed by these ill-fitt ing businesses were reallocated to enhance productivity and mechanisation initiatives and to fuel capital investments in businesses that offered greater promise for achieving Welchs lofty vision of being first or second in their chosen global markets. (Aguilar et al., 1985)It might be argued that the key role for the leader is displace context he or she must create a culture that embraces the importance of change. The leader then needs to create an organization structure that will support the new vision. This might, for example, involve a team-based shape to reduce centralization, hierarchy, and bureaucratization. The leader must select and hire top-notch people who have the skills necessary to bring the new vision to actuality. If the vision involves globalization, for example, this might involve hiring or promoting people who have international experience. The leader must also create a reward system that encourages behaviors appropriate for the new vision. For example, if the vi sion requires more focus on the customer, then employees must be rewarded for actions that improve customer satisfaction. In other words, the leaders most important role may be to devise an organization that sustains the vision.Implications For Change In An Internet Environment Sebastianand Samuel(2004) explore the challenge that technology will deliver to management at both the tactical and strategic level. Changes in communication, content of communication, globalization of communication, are critical to these changes. The environment will support a greater phase of discontinuities in planning which is brought about by the globalization of management activities. Successful management must track the management of these discontinuities but use information in an artificial intelligence environment. The integration of these data and the actions that come from that integration must be understood within a moral framework. (Sebastian& Samuel, 2004)In the present era of technological i nnovation and globalization, when the worlds business is coming closer to work as a network, when the logistics are being designed in a way that encompass the ever so easy access of technology, communication and information, when a single business is catering to the markets around the globe, the changes within the organization become more important than those ever were. It is the international culture that the employees have to work in, the greater than ever expansion plans and newer and hurrying service demands that they have to attend to. All these developments and enhancements come as part and result of the Internet environment in which virtually all businesses are operating these days.ConclusionLeading change in such circumstances become an even more demanding and challenging of a task for the managers or leaders. As the trade of goods and services around the world is getting faster and easier, the need for as fast a change continues. However as mentioned in the preceding pages that such changes cannot be brought overnight, nor can those be imposed or pushed hard on the individuals. The system pushes back even harder and poses even more resistance to the change. Instead, the vision once established has to be communicated to the people properly, make them ready for the change by suitably establishing the loopholes of the current state and furnish the future expectations of being technologically sound and equipped.ReferencesAguilar, F. J., Hamermesh, R. G., and Brainard, C. General Electric, 1984. (1985) Boston Harvard Business School Press (9385315, Rev. Mar. 24, 1993).Conger, J. A. (1989) The Charismatic Leader San Francisco Jossey-Bass.Greiner, L., and Bhambri, A. (1989) New CEO Intervention and Dynamics of Deliberate Strategic Change. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 6786.Lawler, E. E. (1986) High-Involvement Management San Francisco Jossey-Bass, 1986.Lawler, E., Mohrman, S., and Ledford, G. (1995) Creating High Performance Organizations Practices and Results of Employee Involvement and Total Quality Management in Fortune 1000 Companies San Francisco Jossey-Bass.Nadler, D., (1997) Champions of Change San Francisco Jossey-Bass.Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M., and Nason, S. (1997) A Dimensional Analysis of the Relationship Between Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness, Satisfaction, and Strain. Journal of Management, 23 (5), 679704.Tichy, N., and Devanna, M. (1986) The sack Leader New York Wiley.Wolf D. Schumacher Managing Barriers To Re-engineering Success. http//www.prosci.com/w_4.htm Accessed January 31, 2007.